40 years ago on April 4th, Dr.
Luther King Jr. was assassinated and this nation lost one of the
greatest leaders for peace and justice that we have ever known. Here is
a sampling of his quotes and speechesówords that, decades later, still
inspire new generations of folks to action. His words are as important
today as they were 40 years ago.
nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military
defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual
"I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so
tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the
bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality...
I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final
"The time is always right to do
what is right." - MLK.
- Silent Peace Vigils on
Friday Afternoons 5 - 5:30pm
- Rain or Shine, let
your silence be heard!
- Pro-peace or Anti-war
messages only, please.
- No personal nor
- Join those who share
your concerns and take a stand for your
- Signs are provided.
- Meet across the
the Post Office on College Street in Macon, Georgia
(running against Saxby) is www.knightforsenate.com
A new study by the
Center for Public Integrity documents 935
public lies by leading members of the Bush clique in the two
years after 9/11/2001 to mislead Americans into supporting their
aggression against Iraq.
935 Lies by
the Bush clique:
2-minute video on how the billions wasted on
war COULD HAVE BEEN SPENT:
God doesn't order jihad
I have some concerns
about the recent letter to the editor asserting that the Iraq war is
actually a "mandate from God."
since God is omnipotent (all-knowing), shouldn't he have clued
President Bush in to the fact that Iraq did not have weapons of mass
Next, I really don't
believe that God is in the business of ordering Christian jihad (holy
if I am guilty of "blasphemous comments" by criticizing Bush's handling
of the Iraq war, I will gladly stand in judgment for those beliefs
before my maker.
Daryl J. Morton
Posted on Fri, Mar.
God is not an American
ever there were a near-blasphemous statement about the Bush
administration's attack on Iraq, it is Dwain Penn's saying it was "a
mandate from God." Last time I checked - I have a graduate degree in
Bible and theology - the Holy Trinity does not consist of Bush, Cheney
Like you and me, they
are sinful human beings; we
need to pray not only for daily bread, but for daily forgiveness and a
closer walk with God (Jesus for Christians) in order to grow in love
and service of others.
Let us pray for our
elected leaders in
this light. By the way, God is not a Republican, not even an American.
God loves every person, whether in America (North and South), Africa,
Asia, etc. Do we? Something else to pray for if we want to be more like
David B. Conner, M. Divinity
Mandate from God?
who took that phone call? Unfortunately, by using this logic the writer
has just endorsed every Islamic extremist out there. Their God told
them to do it, too. May I suggest that we all need to drag our
Bibles/Korans out and do some reading before we drag God into the
First, pick a
testament - if you are going to quote the Old Testament, then live
the Old Testament. If you want guidance, seek out some Jewish people
because the Old Testament is how they live their lives.
you reference the New Testament, I think you will find it difficult to
say that anyone mandated anything like war. WWJD? Bomb someone? Really?
Yes, we have a social conscience to protect our people, our country,
etc., but we should be looking at things from a higher perspective
instead of the basest of human experience.
It is interesting
that we are reacting more like Cain and Abel and less like Jesus
thousands of years after his death.
Posted on Thu, Mar.
A mandate from God
this year at a local church breakfast, I overheard someone say, "the
Iraq war is a farce." As a Republican, the assessment offended me, and
as a Christian, I was surprised this person did not fully understand
why President Bush went to war in Iraq - a mandate from God.
Mr. Bush was cleaning up a mess left by President Clinton. Saddam
Hussein was a thorn in the paw of the world. Even the most liberal
media dubbed Saddam as the madman of the Middle East, the bad man of
Baghdad. His saber rattling about his military power concerned world
When the U.S. invaded
Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001, in
response to 9/11, we had no conflict with the government of Afghanistan
except perhaps their opium production. We were after al-Qaida and
Taliban strongholds there.
resources already in the
area, it was only a prudent and wise decision to invade Iraq. In
bowling, they call it a one-ten split. The report, later to be revealed
was wrong, that Saddam had purchased radioactive materials from Niger
was from a government agency with a half-century legacy of accuracy.
is Iraq dubbed "Bush's War?" The press will stop at nothing to put a
Democrat back in the White House. Before voicing disparaging remarks
about something that has such strong ties with God, one should pause
and ask for spiritual insight. Otherwise one may be guilty of
Dwain W. Penn
Posted on Wed, Mar.
Viewpoints, someone compared
Sen. Barack Obama's "change" to Mao and Lenin. For this poor
illiterate's information, Mao killed more people than anyone in the
history of the world (80 million) and Lenin's change was not an
intelligent passive political or economic change; he was a murderer, a
liar and a psycho.
Mr. Obama is advising
the voters of America
that if they vote for him, he will do everything in his power to
correct the mistakes and idiocies of the guy I once voted for. Mr. Bush
will probably go down as America's most inept president as well as
putting young men and women in harm's way in Iraq.
The world is
full of dictators: Wouldn't it have made more sense to blame 9/11 on
Saudi Arabia where 15 of the culprits were born, educated and trained,
than Sadaam's Iraq who had absolutely nothing to do with the attack?
is a terrifically intelligent person who will take the reins of the
presidency and do as well as anyone can do, given the mess that Mr.
Bush will hand over to him. As to the Rev. Wright's negative remarks
concerning America, I think Obama should be judged to be very brave in
not turning his back on this person. It would have been much easier for
him to say "I reject this person and am appalled at his remarks," but
instead he reminded us all that we have sat in a church, synagogue or
temple and at times listened to the sermon and not agreed with the
preacher, be he a priest, pastor or rabbi.
Robert L. Schwartz
Posted on Wed, Mar.
article calling for impeachment
in The Sunday Washington Post
Why I Believe Bush Must Go
Nixon Was Bad. These Guys Are
By George McGovern
Sunday, January 6, 2008; B01
As we enter
the eighth year of the Bush-Cheney administration, I have
belatedly and painfully concluded that the only honorable course for me
is to urge the impeachment of the president and the vice president.
After the 1972 presidential election, I
stood clear of calls to impeach
President Richard M. Nixon for his misconduct during the campaign. I
thought that my joining the impeachment effort would be seen as an
expression of personal vengeance toward the president who had defeated
Today I have made a different choice.
Of course, there seems to be little
bipartisan support for impeachment.
The political scene is marked by narrow and sometimes superficial
partisanship, especially among Republicans, and a lack of courage and
statesmanship on the part of too many Democratic politicians. So the
chances of a bipartisan impeachment and conviction are not promising.
But what are the facts?
Bush and Cheney are clearly guilty of
numerous impeachable offenses.
They have repeatedly violated the Constitution. They have transgressed
national and international law. They have lied to the American people
time after time. Their conduct and their barbaric policies have reduced
our beloved country to a historic low in the eyes of people around the
world. These are truly "high crimes and misdemeanors," to use the
From the beginning, the Bush-Cheney team's
assumption of power was the
product of questionable elections that probably should have been
officially challenged -- perhaps even by a congressional investigation.
In a more fundamental sense, American
democracy has been derailed
throughout the Bush-Cheney regime. The dominant commitment of the
administration has been a murderous, illegal, nonsensical war against
Iraq. That irresponsible venture has killed almost 4,000 Americans,
left many times that number mentally or physically crippled, claimed
the lives of an estimated 600,000 Iraqis (according to a careful
October 2006 study from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health) and laid waste their country. The financial cost to the United
States is now $250 million a day and is expected to exceed a total of
$1 trillion, most of which we have borrowed from the Chinese and others
as our national debt has now climbed above $9 trillion -- by far the
highest in our national history.
All of this has been done without the
declaration of war from Congress
that the Constitution clearly requires, in defiance of the U.N. Charter
and in violation of international law. This reckless disregard for life
and property, as well as constitutional law, has been accompanied by
the abuse of prisoners, including systematic torture, in direct
violation of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
I have not been heavily involved in singing
the praises of the Nixon
administration. But the case for impeaching Bush and Cheney is far
stronger than was the case against Nixon and Vice President Spiro T.
Agnew after the 1972 election. The nation would be much more secure and
productive under a Nixon presidency than with Bush. Indeed, has any
administration in our national history been so damaging as the
How could a once-admired, great nation fall
into such a quagmire of
killing, immorality and lawlessness?
It happened in part because the Bush-Cheney
team repeatedly deceived
Congress, the press and the public into believing that Saddam Hussein
had nuclear arms and other horrifying banned weapons that were an
"imminent threat" to the United States. The administration also led the
public to believe that Iraq was involved in the 9/11 attacks -- another
blatant falsehood. Many times in recent years, I have recalled
Jefferson's observation: "Indeed I tremble for my country when I
reflect that God is just."
The basic strategy of the administration has
been to encourage a
climate of fear, letting it exploit the 2001 al-Qaeda attacks not only
to justify the invasion of Iraq but also to excuse such dangerous
misbehavior as the illegal tapping of our telephones by government
agents. The same fear-mongering has led government spokesmen and
cooperative members of the press to imply that we are at war with the
entire Arab and Muslim world -- more than a billion people.
Another shocking perversion has been the
shipping of prisoners scooped
off the streets of Afghanistan to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and other
countries without benefit of our time-tested laws of habeas corpus.
Although the president was advised by the
intelligence agencies last
August that Iran had no program to develop nuclear weapons, he
continued to lie to the country and the world. This is the same
strategy of deception that brought us into war in the Arabian Desert
and could lead us into an unjustified invasion of Iran. I can say with
some professional knowledge and experience that if Bush invades yet
another Muslim oil state, it would mark the end of U.S. influence in
the crucial Middle East for decades.
Ironically, while Bush and Cheney made
counterterrorism the battle cry
of their administration, their policies -- especially the war in Iraq
-- have increased the terrorist threat and reduced the security of the
United States. Consider the difference between the policies of the
first President Bush and those of his son. When the Iraqi army marched
into Kuwait in August 1990, President George H.W. Bush gathered the
support of the entire world, including the United Nations, the European
Union and most of the Arab League, to quickly expel Iraqi forces from
Kuwait. The Saudis and Japanese paid most of the cost. Instead of
getting bogged down in a costly occupation, the administration
established a policy of containing the Baathist regime with
international arms inspectors, no-fly zones and economic sanctions.
Iraq was left as a stable country with little or no capacity to
Today, after five years of clumsy, mistaken
policies and U.S. military
occupation, Iraq has become a breeding ground of terrorism and bloody
civil strife. It is no secret that former president Bush, his secretary
of state, James A. Baker III, and his national security adviser, Gen.
Brent Scowcroft, all opposed the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq.
In addition to the shocking breakdown of
presidential legal and moral
responsibility, there is the scandalous neglect and mishandling of the
Hurricane Katrina catastrophe. The veteran CNN commentator Jack
Cafferty condenses it to a sentence: "I have never ever seen anything
as badly bungled and poorly handled as this situation in New Orleans."
Any impeachment proceeding must include a careful and critical look at
the collapse of presidential leadership in response to perhaps the
worst natural disaster in U.S. history.
Impeachment is unlikely, of course. But we
must still urge Congress to
act. Impeachment, quite simply, is the procedure written into the
Constitution to deal with presidents who violate the Constitution and
the laws of the land. It is also a way to signal to the American people
and the world that some of us feel strongly enough about the present
drift of our country to support the impeachment of the false prophets
who have led us astray. This, I believe, is the rightful course for an
As former representative Elizabeth Holtzman,
who played a key role in
the Nixon impeachment proceedings, wrote two years ago, "it wasn't
until the most recent revelations that President Bush directed the
wiretapping of hundreds, possibly thousands, of Americans, in violation
of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) -- and argued that,
as Commander in Chief, he had the right in the interests of national
security to override our country's laws -- that I felt the same sinking
feeling in my stomach as I did during Watergate. . . . A President, any
President, who maintains that he is above the law -- and repeatedly
violates the law -- thereby commits high crimes and misdemeanors."
I believe we have a chance to heal the
wounds the nation has suffered
in the opening decade of the 21st century. This recovery may take a
generation and will depend on the election of a series of rational
presidents and Congresses. At age 85, I won't be around to witness the
completion of the difficult rebuilding of our sorely damaged country,
but I'd like to hold on long enough to see the healing begin.
There has never been a day in my adult life
when I would not have
sacrificed that life to save the United States from genuine danger,
such as the ones we faced when I served as a bomber pilot in World War
II. We must be a great nation because from time to time, we make
gigantic blunders, but so far, we have survived and recovered.
Iraq and Climate Change
What does the Iraq
War have to do with Climate Change? (here)
Surge of More Lies:
A Surge of More Lies
by Congressman Robert Wexler
A new troubling myth has taken hold in Washington and it is critical
that the record is set straight. According to the mainstream media,
Republicans, and unfortunately even some Democrats, the President's
surge in Iraq has been a resounding success. In
fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
This assertion is disingenuous, factually incorrect, and negatively
impacts America's national security. The Surge had a clear and defined
objective - to create stability and security - enabling the Iraqi
government to enact lasting political solutions and foster genuine
reconciliation and cooperation between Sunnis, Shias, and Kurds.
This has not happened.
There has been negligible political
progress in Iraq, and we are no closer to solving the complex problems
- including a power sharing government, oil revenue agreement and new
constitution - than we were before the Administration upped the ante
and sent 30,000 more troops to Iraq.
Too many Democrats in Congress are again surrendering to General
Petraeus and have failed to challenge the Bush Administration's claims
that the surge has been successful. In fact -- it is just
The reduction in violence in Iraq has exposed the continuing failure of
Iraqi officials to solve their substantial political rifts. By
President Bush's own stated goal of political progress, the Surge has
Of course raising troop levels has increased security - a strategy the
Bush administration ignored when presented by General Shinseki before
the war in Iraq began - but the fundamental internal Iraqi problems
remain and the factors that were accelerating the civil war in 2007
have simply been put on hold.
The military progress is a testament to the patience and dedication of
our brave troops - even in the face of 15 month-long deployments
followed by insufficient Veteran's health services when they return
home. They have performed brilliantly - despite the insult of having
President Bush recently veto a military spending bill that enhanced
funding and benefits, and increased care.
Despite the efforts of American soldiers, the surge alone cannot bring
about the political solutions needed to end centuries of sectarian
As it stands, little on the ground supports the assertion that Iraqis
are ready to stand up and govern themselves. Too few Iraqi troops are
trained, equipped and combat ready, and they cannot yet provide
adequate security. Loyalty is also an issue in the Iraqi army as Al
Queda and Sunni insurgents infliltrate their defense forces. The
consequences turned deadly just recently when an Iraqi soldier
purposely killed two U.S. troops.
On the streets of Baghdad and Mosul, the Sunni and Shia factions have
paused their fighting, awaiting guarantees and protections that have
not yet been delivered. As Iraqi refugees return, there is no mechanism
to help them rebuild their lives, nor recover their now-occupied homes.
Neighborhoods once mixed are now segregated.
In Northern Iraq, Kurdish terrorists conducting nefarious operations
across the border into Turkey have compelled our NATO ally to strike at
bases, inflaming tensions between Baghdad and Ankara.
The surge is working? We suffered more U.S. casualties in 2007 than in
any other year of the war. We can't
afford any more of this type of success.
How can we create the situation that is most likely to deliver
political progress in Iraq? Not by continuing the surge and occupation.
Our best chance (there is no guarantee) is by putting real pressure on
the Iraqi government to force action. Telling the national and local
Iraqi leaders that we are withdrawing our troops can help accomplish
this goal. Today, the majority Iraqi Shia government led by Prime
Minister Nouri al-Maliki has little incentive to act when American
troops remain in the country to provide security and stability.
Based on the Administration's plan, John
McCain's proposal of a 100-year US occupation could be a reality!
The Democratic Congress must act aggressively to first cut off funding
for the surge and then the entire war. Many of my colleagues avoided a
showdown with the administration because they mistakenly believed such
a fight would endanger the safety of the troops.
In fact, we must accept that every soldier killed or injured in the
coming months should have already been home. Every billion dollars of
war-appropriations we spend from here on should have been spent on
genuine priorities here at home such as children's heath care.
Enough is enough: While the Administration over-commits American forces
in Iraq, we see Al Qaeda-regrouping and Osama Bin Laden still at large.
We remain seriously bogged down in Afghanistan, and are witnessing a
crisis in Pakistan that has left a nuclear country on the brink of a
meltdown. America's resources and attention are desperately needed
elsewhere and our soldiers must no longer be needlessly sacrificed as
we wait for Iraqis to stand up.
The Surge has failed. If my
colleagues gullibly accept the moving rationale for the Surge, just as
so many have for the war itself, we will have failed as well.
***To contact me or for more information, go to www.wexlerforcongress.com .
The United States Institute of Peace (usip.org)
is an independent, nonpartisan, national institution established and
funded by Congress.
... about Truth"
Last week our
community lost a real treasure with the passing
of Ron Richards. Ron was a gentle soul who touched the lives of all
those around him with kindness and love.
On a cold,
blustery afternoon in late February 2003, Ron stood at the
corner of Pio Nono and Vineville avenues holding aloft a sign
protesting America's imminent invasion of Iraq. Some of the drivers
passing by gave Ron a thumbs-up or honked their horns, while many
others made obscene gestures toward him.
Last Friday, the
weekly gathering to protest the war drew a much larger
crowd than would have been possible four years ago. Those who honked in
solidarity with the demonstrators far outnumbered those who directed
obscene gestures. It seems that many have finally realized what Ron
tried to tell us years four ago: That the invasion of Iraq was a tragic
mistake, a fiasco of the first order, an immoral waste of human life
and valuable resources, and a testimony to national arrogance and
We will miss you,
Ron, but we will always remember the example you set
for us, and we will try to keep faith.
Posted on Fri, Oct. 19, 2007
Georgians for "Bringing
Them Home" - Now!...
The job of a Citizen is to Speak-Out (Mouths Wide Open)
- Please join us -
THIRD FRIDAY of every month
weekends. Dec. 21-23; Jan. 18-20.
Sisters Lee A. Johnson
of Macon, left, and Peggy Johnson, a Navy veteran of Lexington Okla.
attend a peace rally at the Pentagon in Washington, DC