| Ga division of FHWA |
||
|
Macon
Area Transportation Study memberships By-Laws Citizens Advisory Committee Caution Macon |
||
|
Next Meeting Dates: MATS Policy
Meeting: Feb 3rd, 2010
478.751.7463. Gregory L. Brown |
||
CAC Comments
on the LRPT The LRTP is not a document that looks forward. It tries to solve new problems with old thinking, and this just doesn't work. It hasn't worked in the past, and it certainly won't work in the future, particularly as the cost of fuel increases and its availability becomes limited. Planning wisdom says: if you plan roads for cars you get cars in your community. If you plan roads for people you get people. We are planning for cars, and that is all we are getting. We need to plan for people to stem the tide of the exodus to other counties. Instead, we are planning to accommodate THEIR cars at the expense of OUR people. The allocation of funds is terribly flawed. The LRTP shows 75% of future funds going to expansion of the local system. The rest goes for maintenance and transit, with about 6% for transit. New construction and expansion funding should be greatly decreased. Funding at this level is definitely not going to support the needs of the community in the future nor is it supported by the demand models which are also a part of the document. The demand models show flat growth across the community except on the interstate, particularly I-475. We do not need to devote most of our funding for new construction. Maintenance should be greatly increased. We also do not have enough money to properly maintain our existing infrastructure, and continued under-funding will only make this problem worse. The portion of the funding allocated for maintenance should be greatly increased. Transit funding should be greatly increased. Progressive communities understand that planning for transit makes a viable community. This is particularly true as the baby boom generation ages and a huge cohort (the senior citizen cohort is the group showing the most growth) reaches an age when driving a car is no longer advisable. In Bibb County we already have a large number of people living in poverty, and that cohort is not going to decrease, particularly if access to jobs is limited by the ability to get to them. As climate concerns receive the attention that they require, the communities that have planned for alternatives will be more attractive to industry. Why shouldn't Bibb be one of those communities? We need to map our neighborhoods. There are lots of maps in the plan, but this isn't one of them. Progressive communities map their neighborhoods. What this does is allow planning to reflect the values and the needs of the communities. We only look at a system of roads, not the places through which they travel. If planning is done from a neighborhood perspective, not only will it serve the county better, but planning can occur with the community instead of being imposed on the community. The LRTP as a document continues to show a commitment to the old DOT model of DAD – Design, Announce, and Defend. Changing the planning perspective to a neighborhood model will go a long way toward changing this paradigm. We are desperately in need of a new paradigm. Map vacant commercial properties. We know that we have a big problem with vacancies in the county, but how big is it? Without a map, we don't know how big the problem really is. Before we commit tax dollars to new infrastructure to accommodate shifting businesses, we need to think about incentives for redevelopment and/or disincentives for building new centers that will be vacant in a few years. All of this shifting costs the taxpayers money as they are still providing services for the vacant properties, while at the same time must meet expanding demand for the new. We can't afford to continue to do this. Map vacant residential properties. We know that there are many abandoned, vacant, and repossessed properties in Macon. It may be necessary to shrink the size of the city in some areas if properties that fall into these categories make up a large percentage of the neighborhood. Once again, we provide all of the services in these areas: schools, police protection, maintenance of infrastructure, and it may not be feasible to continue to do this. In some areas, it may be possible to develop appropriate properties into pocket parks or community gardens that can enhance the livability of the neighborhood. |
|
The City of |
The County of |
|
CAC
Meeting at P+Z
(top-left picture) Theresa and Milton
McKinney look at
road plans in front of Jim Thomas. The McKinney home is being
threatened by GaDOT plans to widen and move Sardis Church Road. See news
articles here:
about Sardis Church Rd.12-5-07 (top-right) Christine Barwick who lives off Park Street outlines her neighborhood concerns about cut-through traffic speeding.
|
| From: "J H Webb" <jhw@mylink.net> To: "Tim Thornton" <tdthornton@bellsouth.net>, "Mary Ann Richardson" <mar5331@cox.net>, Subject: report of the 12-12-07 TCC meeting Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 Dear CAC members,
I attended
the TCC
meeting on Wednesday, 12-12-07 and their agenda was
essentially the same as ours.
During the
"Old/New Business" portion of the agenda, Vernon made the announcement
that the TCC and the Policy Committees would have added to their
agendae a section for "CAC Report". (This was agreed on by the
TCC and I suppose needs to be done for the Policy Committee, too, so
whoever goes next Wednesday make sure it is mentioned.) This is a
good step, and I thank Vernon for it because it gives us a scheduled
portion of those meetings and treats us less like a step-child.
Vernon asked,
and I agree, that when we give our reports, that the motions we
report which are votes on agendae items be separate from any "New
Business". This makes sense to me and I had thought of separating
them on the attached memo anyway.
As for the fate of our motions,
please refer to the attached memo with its eleven motions.
Lastly, staff
announced that they were trying to go pretty much "paperless" for all
committees in the future. Environmentally, this is a good
thing. However, my later thought on it is that it is a little
unfair to CAC in that the other committee members can print out, at
tax-payer expense, the reams of paper and reports, whereas the CAC
members would have to print them out at their own private
expense. This does not seem quite right to me, and I will send
Vernon a note about it, asking that the CAC be provided a few hard
copies of the available (online) reports in the future.
Sorry I won't
be able to attend on Wednesday,... I could not reschedule.
Regards,
Jaime Webb
James H. Webb, Associate Broker
Sheridan Solomon and Associates Realtors 2618 Riverside Drive Macon, GA 31204 Tele: 800-329-9980, ext. 322 or 478-746-2000, ext. 322 Fax: 478-746-2003 email: jhw@mylink.net |
|
CAC Motions
12-5-07 TO: MATS TCC and Policy Committee FROM: MATS CAC DATE: 5 December 2007
1) The CAC voted to accept, without comment, the draft of the Unified Planning Work Program, FY 2009.
of rights-of-way and construction
easements, and all other pertinent information and documentation for
all projects, current and future, which are planned for the MPO.
10) The CAC makes the motion that the Policy Committee hire an expert urban planner, acceptable to the Forest Hill Road residents, to assist said residents in the proposed mediation. 11) The CAC makes the motion that
the
Policy Committee ask GDOT to hold an “open discussion” public
forum, with a Q&A-format, regarding the Forest Hill Road projects
which includes current maps showing the project design, landscaping
and right-of-way plans prior to the proposed mediation. |
MATS Policy Committee meeting on Wednesday 12-19-07
| |
Here is audio of meeting - 12-19-07
The
audio is 11.5 MB big in MP3 format. It should open automatically
with Windows Media Player, or it may just simply open automatically in
another program.
Susan Hanberry Martin
- CAC report begins at 10 minutes before the ending.
Chairman Bishop tried to deny her time to read our report (which we
understood from the CAC meeting - should have been listed as an agenda
item, but it was not)
Bishop never actually said "Shut Up!" to the citizens. But, Bishop did try to abort the CAC report several times. Listen here to one minute of his anti-citizen, fillibustering, rhetoric:... ( Listen) |
|
|
i![]() |
|||
|
|||
|
MATS POLICY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES December 19, 2007
A meeting of the MATS Policy Committee was held on December 19th at 9:30 a.m. in the County Engineering Annex. There were 8 voting members present, thereby establishing a quorum. The minutes of the previous meeting were introduced and approved. The first item discussed was the draft Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) presented by Jim Thomas. Mr. Thomas stated that this document outlines the work tasks by funding category and the final copy of the UPWP will be presented in May. Subsequently, a motion was made by Susan Hanberry Martin and seconded by Elmo Richardson to approve the draft UPWP. The motion was approved unanimously by the committee.
The next item was the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and TIP amendments presented by Vernon Ryle. According to the SAFETEA-LU requirements, projections by network year for road projects are required based on year of expenditure amounts. Therefore, the revenue and cost items for projects must use an inflation rate to reflect the year of expenditure dollars. Furthermore, the plan must be financially balanced according to the requirements. In addition, the CMAQ projects were presented to the committee members for inclusion in the TIP. These projects involve the retrofit of existing vehicles and the purchase of hybrid vehicles. Mr. Ryle also stated that a new set of CMAQ applications are currently being prepared for submittal to the Georgia D.O.T. A resolution to amend the LRTP and TIP was presented by Mr. Ryle to include the year of expenditures estimates and the CMAQ projects. Subsequently, a motion was made by Susan Hanberry Martin and seconded by Tony Rojas to approve the resolution amending the LRTP and the TIP which was approved by the committee. Susan Hanberry Martin also added that the CAC was not able to recommend approval of the resolution.
Vernon Ryle also discussed the Conformity Determination Report (CDR). This document is done in order to comply with the air quality requirements for PM 2.5 and ozone levels. As part of the CDR, a regional emission analysis is required using specified modeling techniques. The conformity determination for the amended LRTP and TIP met the required federal emission standards. A resolution to amend the CDR was introduced to the Policy Committee by Vernon Ryle. Subsequently, a motion was made by Mayor Reichert and Tony Rojas to adopt the CDR resolution which was subsequently approved by the committee.
The next item discussed on the agenda was the Project Status Report. Tom Queen of Georgia D.O.T. stated that the HPP projects had been added to the report and a meeting concerning the I-75/I-16 interchange project had been held. He also stated that a concept had not been developed yet for the reconfiguration of the Lower Thomaston Rd. and Lamar Rd. intersection. It was determined by GDOT that a roundabout for this project was not feasible and Vernon Ryle asked if this matter could be explained in more detail. Tom Queen stated that in the future the Planning & Zoning Office will be invited to road concept meetings and be provided with right of way plans. Tony Rojas requested that the project status report include all projects and not just preconstruction items. In addition, Lonnie Miley inquired about the Millerfield Rd. project and stated there were sections where the sidewalks were not complete. Charles Bishop commented that David Lucas had already discussed this matter with GDOT. Furthermore, Van Etheridge stated that this project could be completed once the environmental document had been approved.
Under New Business, Vernon Ryle stated that at future MATS meetings, the comments of the CAC should be included on the agenda. Susan Hanberry Martin presented a memo from the CAC containing a number of items that were discussed at their last meeting. One of the items requested that all documents to be voted on by the MATS Committees be presented two weeks before the scheduled meeting. Subsequently, Charles Bishop stated that the Policy Committee would not able to vote on the items at this time. Furthermore, Tony Rojas suggested that this item should be placed on the agenda for the next meeting so it can be reviewed in more detail. Charles Bishop stated that the CAC memo would be taken under consideration at the next Policy meeting and there will also be a review of the MATS By-laws and CAC appointments. Finally, the new MATS Policy members in attendance were introduced to the committee. Being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned.
|
|||
MATS TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES December 12, 2007
A meeting of the MATS Technical Coordinating Committee was held on December 12th at 10 a.m. in the Planning & Zoning Office. There were 10 voting members present, thereby establishing a quorum. The minutes of the previous meeting were introduced and approved. The first item discussed was the draft Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) presented by Jim Thomas. Mr. Thomas stated that this document is required in order to receive federal grants. He reviewed the work program for FY 2009 that included such tasks as MATS Coordination and Citizen Outreach programs. The final copy of the UPWP will be presented in May. Subsequently, a motion was made by Phil Clark and seconded by James Webb to recommend the draft UPWP to the Policy Committee for approval. The motion was approved unanimously by the committee. The next item was the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and TIP amendments presented by Vernon Ryle. According to the SAFETEA-LU requirements, projections by network year for road projects are required based on year of expenditure amounts. Therefore, the revenue and cost items for projects must use an inflation rate to reflect the year of expenditure dollars. This information was presented to the committee in an amendment to the LRTP. In addition, the CMAQ projects were also presented to the committee members for inclusion in the TIP. These projects involve the retrofit of existing vehicles and the purchase of hybrid vehicles. In addition, Mr. Ryle stated that a new set of CMAQ applications are currently being prepared for submittal to the Georgia D.O.T. Subsequently, a motion was made by Phil Clark and seconded by Kelly Gwin to approve the amendments to the LRTP and the TIP which was approved by the committee. Vernon Ryle also discussed the Conformity Determination Report (CDR). This report is done in order to comply with the air quality requirements for PM 2.5 and ozone levels. The revisions to the CDR involved the different network years for the various road projects. A motion was made by Vernon Ryle and seconded by Ken Sheets to adopt the CDR which was subsequently approved by the committee unanimously. The next item discussed on the agenda was the Project Status Report. Tom Queen of Georgia D.O.T. stated that the HPP projects had been added to the report and a meeting concerning the I-75/I-16 interchange project had been held. He also stated that a meeting concerning the Sardis Church extension had been held and that ROW plans had been approved and property acquisition had begun for this project. Van Etheridge also stated a meeting with the GDOT Urban Design section had been held concerning the project and the problems of the residents in the area were presented. As a result of the meeting, the issues of the citizens were resolved and no houses will be taken as part of the project. Under New Business, Vernon Ryle stated that at future MATS Technical meetings, the comments of the CAC should be presented. He also stated that a committee should be formed to review the existing road projects and work with Georgia D.O.T. This committee should be composed of Jim Thomas, Tim Pitrowski, Phil Clark, and Ken Sheets. James Webb
presented a memo from the CAC containing a number of motions that
were made at their last meeting. One motion requested that all
documents to be voted on by the MATS Committees be presented two
weeks before the scheduled meeting. Subsequently, a motion was made
by Phil Clark and seconded by Danny Tavakol to forward this
recommendation to the Policy Committee which was approved by the TCC
members. Another motion that was presented by Mr. Webb stated that
the MPO and MATS Committees be provided in the future with updated
plans for road projects. Tom Queen of Georgia D.O.T. stated that
approved ROW plans for road projects could be made available at the
MPO level. Other motions discussed included RIP projects as part of
the MATS process and the mediation of the Forest Hill Rd. project.
After the memo was presented, it was decided that this information
should be presented to the Policy Committee for further review. Also
under New Business, Phil Clark stated that the Safe Routes to School
plan was scheduled to be finished in March. Being no further business
to discuss, the meeting was adjourned. |
|||
| |
CAUTION Macon |
| Lindsay 'Doc' Holliday | |
|
Holliday Dental Associates 360 Spring Street Macon, GA 31201 |
office 478-746-5695 home 478-742-8699 Thank-You... |